Downloads provided by UsageCounts
pmid: 21524795
Burning biomass fuels such as wood on indoor open-pit stoves is common in developing regions. In such settings, exposure to harmful combustion products such as fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)), carbon monoxide (CO) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is of concern. We aimed to investigate if the replacement of open pit stoves by improved stoves equipped with a chimney would significantly reduce exposure to PAHs, PM(2.5) and CO. Two stove projects were evaluated in Peru. Program A was part of the Juntos National Program in which households built their own stoves using materials provided. In Program B, Barrick Gold Corporation hired a company to produce and install the stoves locally. A total of 30 and 27 homes participated in Program A and B, respectively. We collected personal and kitchen air samples, as well as morning urine samples from women tasked with cooking in the households before and after the installation of the improved stoves. Median levels of PM(2.5) and CO were significantly reduced in kitchen and personal air samples by 47-74% after the installation of the new stoves, while the median reduction of 10 urinary hydroxylate PAH metabolites (OH-PAHs) was 19%-52%. The observed OH-PAH concentration in this study was comparable or higher than the 95th percentile of the general U.S. population, even after the stove intervention, indicating a high overall exposure in this population.
Adult, Fires, Young Adult, Peru, Humans, Biomass, Cooking, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Household Articles, Carbon Monoxide, Inhalation Exposure, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Wood, Air Pollution, Indoor, Female, Particulate Matter, Environmental Monitoring
Adult, Fires, Young Adult, Peru, Humans, Biomass, Cooking, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Household Articles, Carbon Monoxide, Inhalation Exposure, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Wood, Air Pollution, Indoor, Female, Particulate Matter, Environmental Monitoring
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 80 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 69 | |
| downloads | 39 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts