Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Article
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Article . 2010
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2010
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Article . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

Embolic Protection Devices: No Room for Standardization

Authors: Setacci C.;

Embolic Protection Devices: No Room for Standardization

Abstract

proposed [transcervical carotid stenting (TCS) þ carotid flow reversal] was associated with a low incidence of new ischemic brain lesions (12.5%) when checked by DW-MRI. The aim of the study was to prove the safety of this hybrid procedure (neck surgery þ CAS) in preventing stroke and silent brain infarctions. We know that the real role of CAS is still the subject of debate and no randomized trial has yet proved the superiority of CAS over CEA. 2 From this point of view the paper lacks a comparison with CEA, which is the gold standard for carotid lesions. As a second point, the device used to protect the brain in this study may also be questionable. For best results, the embolic protection device needs to be matched to each patient and lesion: this means that there is no room for standardization as the same device cannot be suitable for all different patients and lesions. CAS could be considered as an alternative to CEA and I strongly believe that there are precise indications for such a hybrid technique. The critical steps of CAS that are most likely to produce emboli are during engagement of the CCA, advancement of the guiding catheter or sheath into the CCA, crossing of the stenotic lesion with the guide wire, stent deployment and balloon dilatation. The hybrid procedure could reduce the embolic load by removing one of these critical steps. As reported by many other Authors, the crucial aspects of CAS (as for every vascular intervention) are the interventionist’s/surgeon’s learning curve, combined with full knowledge of materials. This hybrid technique needs to be restricted to subgroups of patients with a particularly difficult arch anatomy or shaggy aorta, in order to overcome possible preventable access problems. Moreover, as the operator’s skill and materials improve, the trans-femoral approach may be considered more appropriate due to the mini-invasiveness of access (cutdown vs. percutaneous approach), the duration of the procedure, the LOS and possibly lower expense. The clinical significance of new post-procedural silent ischemic cerebral lesions is still unknown; the only certainty is thattodate,CEAistheprocedurewiththelowestembolicrisk.

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
Keywords

Medicine(all), Endarterectomy, Carotid, Carotid Arteries, Risk Factors, Embolism, Humans, Carotid Stenosis, Stents, Equipment Design, Filtration

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
hybrid