Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
European Journal of Internal Medicine
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

ICD-10-CM coding uncovers the gap between serological and clinically identified coeliac disease prevalence: A population-based study

Authors: Ivan Villar-Balboa; Meritxell Regí-Bosque; Jesús Almeda-Ortega; Oriol Cunillera-Puértolas; Yolanda Rando-Matos; Ivan Valencia-Pedraza; Montserrat Merino-Audí; +8 Authors

ICD-10-CM coding uncovers the gap between serological and clinically identified coeliac disease prevalence: A population-based study

Abstract

The International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) is a global health coding system that provides a standardised language for recording, reporting and monitoring diseases. However, epidemiological studies using real-world data on clinically diagnosed coeliac disease (CD) based on the ICD-10-CM remain limited.To evaluate in primary care: (1) the diagnostic adequacy of CD; (2) the accuracy of the ICD-10-CM code K90.0 for identifying CD; and (3) the prevalence of clinically diagnosed CD compared with the known CD seroprevalence in the same geographical area (5‰).This was a population-based, cross-sectional study in the city of L'Hospitalet de Llobregat (269,382 inhabitants), Catalonia, from 2005 to 2020. The data retrieved with the K90.0 code from electronic medical records were cross-checked against laboratory and pathology registries. The CD diagnostic criteria were validated on a case-by-case basis. To calculate the accuracy of the K90.0 code for identifying CD, patients were classified into confirmed versus uncertain/misdiagnosed CD.Overall, 536/737 patients (73 %) had confirmed CD, and 201/737 (27 %) were misdiagnosed. The accuracy of the K90.0 code for identifying CD was as follows: sensitivity, 91.63 %; specificity, 99.95 %; positive predictive value, 63.85 %; and negative predictive value, 99.99 %. The prevalence of clinically diagnosed CD was 1.99‰, with a decreasing age-related trend of -7.5 %.The ICD-10-CM code K90.0 is accurate for identifying clinically diagnosed CD and is thus a great tool for epidemiological disease surveillance. The gap between CD seroprevalence and the prevalence of clinically diagnosed CD (5‰ vs. 1.99‰) calls for the implementation of case-finding programmes to reduce underdiagnosis.

Keywords

Male, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Adolescent, Infant, Middle Aged, Celiac Disease, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, International Classification of Diseases, Spain, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Child, Preschool, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Child, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
hybrid