Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Computers & Securityarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Computers & Security
Article
License: CC BY
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Computers & Security
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 2023
Data sources: DBLP
Computers & Security
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.co...
Article
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Sygma
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

Revealing the unrevealed: Mining smartphone users privacy perception on app markets

Authors: Hatamian, Majid; Serna, Jetzabel; Rannenberg, Kai;

Revealing the unrevealed: Mining smartphone users privacy perception on app markets

Abstract

Abstract Popular smartphone apps may receive several thousands of user reviews containing statements about apps’ functionality, interface, user-friendliness, etc. They sometimes also comprise privacy relevant information that can be extremely helpful for app developers to better understand why users complain about certain privacy aspects of their apps. However, due to the complicated and sometimes vague nature of reviews, it is quite though and time consuming for developers to go through all these reviews to get information about privacy aspects of apps. Furthermore, previous studies confirmed that sometimes bad privacy practices happen due to the app developers’ lack of knowledge in API definition and usage. In addition, such information can be useful for mobile users as the lack of privacy indicators in smartphone ecosystems prevents them from being able to compare apps in terms of privacy and to perform informed privacy decision making when selecting apps. Therefore, in this paper we propose Mobile App Reviews Summarization (MARS) to overcome the aforementioned difficulties. We exploit user reviews on the Google Play Store as a relevant source in order to extract and quantify privacy relevant claims associated with apps. Based on Machine Learning (ML), Natural Language Processing (NLP) and sentiment analysis techniques, MARS detects privacy relevant reviews and categorizes them into a pre-identified list of privacy threats in the context of mobile apps. The combination of these concepts provides developers with specific knowledge about the privacy threats and behavior of apps based on user generated reports that are otherwise difficult to detect. Not only developers, but also users can benefit from such mechanism to compare apps in terms of privacy aspects. To this end, we complement MARS by a novel app behavior monitoring tool that further enhances the whole reliability of the results generated by MARS. Our results demonstrate the applicability of our approach which provides precision, recall and F-score as high as 94.84%, 91.30% and 92.79%, respectively. Also, we obtained interesting findings concerning the quantity and quality of privacy relevant information published in the user reviews and their relation to the apps’ behavior in reality indicating that user reviews are important and valuable source of information regarding the privacy behavior of mobile apps.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    45
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 11
    download downloads 39
  • 11
    views
    39
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
45
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
11
39
Green
hybrid