
Self-healing, a promising solution to cementitious structures' main problem - cracking, involves complex dynamics influenced by factors like crack type, size, and binder material. Existing tests lack a comprehensive approach to describe it. This study coupled the results of X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to water flow tests and optical microscopy to obtain 3D crack volume analysis, water permeability, and crack widths, respectively. Three binder formulations - a pure cement, a 50 % lime - 50 % cement and a 33 % lime - 67 % metakaolin mix - were selected to test the method's accuracy across different mortars. On average, pure cement samples exhibited the best healing efficiency in all tests, albeit not significantly. Interestingly, neither water flow nor microscopy measurements could be correlated to crack volume changes, suggesting different aspects of selfhealing were captured. Micro-CT analysis provided clarification, revealing that self-healing predominately occurred at the surface. Additionally, the precipitation of self-healing products at the pore-crack interface led to certain pores becoming disconnected from the original crack. Therefore, the measured volume change of the crack appeared to be larger than the actual precipitation of healing products. Given the different limitations encountered on all tests, the use of coupled tests is encouraged for future studies.
Mortar, Chemistry, Technology and Engineering, X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), Earth and Environmental Sciences, Self-healing, Lime-based, Material characterization
Mortar, Chemistry, Technology and Engineering, X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), Earth and Environmental Sciences, Self-healing, Lime-based, Material characterization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
