Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Computers & Educatio...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Computers & Education
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
DBLP
Article . 2025
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

“Digital constructivists, activators or presenters? Different profiles of technology integration among swiss upper secondary school teachers”

Authors: Antonietti, Chiara; Consoli, Tessa; Schmitz, Maria-Luisa; Cattaneo, Alberto; Gonon, Philipp; Petko, Dominik;

“Digital constructivists, activators or presenters? Different profiles of technology integration among swiss upper secondary school teachers”

Abstract

This study explores patterns of technology integration in upper secondary school learning activities. Data were collected via an online survey in Switzerland. Through latent profile analysis, three distinct teacher profiles emerged. Teachers in Profile 1 (digital presenters; N = 896) mainly integrated technology to present content; Profile 2 (digital activators; N = 979) used technology for presentation and allowed students to interact with materials; Profile 3 (digital constructivists; N = 213) emphasized student interaction with technology to generate new knowledge over presenting content. Additionally, we investigated how teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) and positive beliefs about technology predict profile membership. The results showed that TPCK and positive beliefs are associated with belonging to a profile. This study outlines distinct technology integration profiles among teachers and highlights the role of TPCK and beliefs in shaping these practices.

Countries
Switzerland, Switzerland
Keywords

Technology integration, teachers' beliefs about technology, upper secondary schools, 10091 Institute of Education, latent profile analysis, 1700 General Computer Science, technological knowledge, 370 Education, 3304 Education

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Green
hybrid