Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Multimedia Tools and...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
ZENODO
Article . 2014
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

MTAP special issue on methods and tools for ground truth collection in multimedia applications

Authors: Spampinato, Concetto; Boom, Bastiaan J.; He, Jiyin;

MTAP special issue on methods and tools for ground truth collection in multimedia applications

Abstract

The importance of having high quality ground truth annotations for a variety of multimedia applications is widely recognised. Indeed, one of the most time-consuming steps in methods’ development is represented by the generation of accurate truth and comparing this truth to the output of applications to provide evidence that the devised methods are performing well in the targeted domain. However, the cost of creating labeled data, which implies asking a human to examine multimedia data thoroughly and provide labels, becomes impractical as datasets to be labeled grow. This can lead to the creation of disparate datasets which are often too small for both learning and evaluating the underlining data distribution. To build up large scale datasets, recently, methods exploiting the collaborative effort of a large population of users annotators (e.g. Labelme, CalTech, Pascal VOC, Trecvid) have been devised. Nevertheless, the creation of a common and large scale ground truth data to train, test and evaluate algorithms for multimedia processing is still a major concern. In particular, the research in ground truth labelling still lacks both in developing user-oriented tools and in automatic methods for supporting annotators in accomplishing their labelling tasks. In fact, tools for ground truth annotation must be user-oriented, providing visual interfaces and methods that are able to guide and speed-up the process of ground truth creation. Under this scenario, multimedia processing methods and collaborative methods play a crucial role. Further, setting up requirements and standards for the creation of multimedia dataset allows other researchers in the field to continue efforts and to contribute to the creation and annotation of multimedia data. This allows researchers to share and extend each others’ work, which is beneficial for the research community.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Top 10%
bronze