<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Addressing bias in NLP-based solutions is crucial to promoting fairness, avoiding discrimination, building trust, upholding ethical standards, and ultimately improving their performance and reliability. On the topic of bias detection and mitigation in textual data, this work examines the effect of different bias detection models along with standard debiasing methods on the effectiveness of fake news and hate speech detection tasks. Extensive discussion of the results draws useful conclusions, highlighting the inherent difficulties in effectively managing bias.
Hate speech detection, Fake news detection, Bias, NLP
Hate speech detection, Fake news detection, Bias, NLP
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |