
Recent image manipulation localization and detection techniques usually leverage forensic artifacts and traces that are produced by a noise-sensitive filter, such as SRM and Bayar convolution. In this paper, we showcase that different filters commonly used in such approaches excel at unveiling different types of manipulations and provide complementary forensic traces. Thus, we explore ways of merging the outputs of such filters and aim to leverage the complementary nature of the artifacts produced to perform image manipulation localization and detection (IMLD). We propose two distinct methods: one that produces independent features from each forensic filter and then fuses them (this is referred to as late fusion) and one that performs early mixing of different modal outputs and produces early combined features (this is referred to as early fusion). We demonstrate that both approaches achieve competitive performance for both image manipulation localization and detection, outperforming state-of-the-art models across several datasets.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
