Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Dataset repositories publish a significant number of datasets continuously within the context of a variety of domains, such as biodiversity and oceanography. To conduct multidisciplinary research, scientists and practitioners must discover datasets from various disciplines unfamiliar with them. Well-known search engines, such as Google dataset and Mendeley data, try to support researchers with cross-domain dataset discovery based on their contents. However, as datasets typically contain scientific observations or collected data from service providers, their contextual information is limited. Accordingly, effective dataset indexing can be impossible to increase the Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability (FAIRness) based on their contextual information. This paper presents an indexing pipeline to extend contextual information of datasets based on their scientific domains by using topic modeling and a set of suggested rules and domain keywords (such as essential variables in environment science) based on domain experts’ suggestions. The pipeline relies on an open ecosystem, where dataset providers publish semantically enhanced metadata on their data repositories. We aggregate, normalize, and reconcile such metadata, providing a dataset search engine that enables research communities to find, access, integrate, and reuse datasets. We evaluated our approach on a manually created gold standard and a user study.
Dataset discovery ·, 020, Metadata standard ·, Dataset indexing ·, Inverted indexing ·, Data repository, 004
Dataset discovery ·, 020, Metadata standard ·, Dataset indexing ·, Inverted indexing ·, Data repository, 004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 61 | |
| downloads | 13 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts