
AbstractPoly‐L‐lactide (PLLA) offers a unique possibility for processing into biocompatible, biodegradable, and implantable piezoelectric structures. With such properties, PLLA has potential to be used as an advanced tool for mimicking biophysical processes that naturally occur during the self‐repair of wounds and damaged tissues, including electrostimulated regeneration. The piezoelectricity of PLLA strongly depends on the possibility of controlling its crystallinity and molecular orientation. Here, it is shown that modifying PLLA with a small amount (1 wt%) of crystalline filler particles with a high aspect ratio, which act as nucleating agents during drawing‐induced crystallization, promotes the formation of highly crystalline and oriented PLLA structures. This increases their piezoelectricity, and the filler‐modified PLLA films provide a 20‐fold larger voltage output than nonmodified PLLA during ultrasound (US)‐assisted activation. With 99% PLLA content, the ability of the films to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) and increase the local temperature during interactions with US is shown to be very low. US‐assisted piezostimulation of adherent cells directly attach to their surface (such as skin keratinocytes), stimulate cytoskeleton formation, and as a result cells elongate and orient themselves in a specific direction that align with the direction of PLLA film drawing and PLLA dipole orientation.
crystallization, piezostimulation, ultrasound, Polyesters, Temperature, piezoelectric biomaterials, poly-L-lactide, Biocompatible Materials, Crystallization, crystallization; piezoelectric biomaterials; piezostimulation; poly-L-lactide; ultrasound
crystallization, piezostimulation, ultrasound, Polyesters, Temperature, piezoelectric biomaterials, poly-L-lactide, Biocompatible Materials, Crystallization, crystallization; piezoelectric biomaterials; piezostimulation; poly-L-lactide; ultrasound
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
