
doi: 10.1002/jcc.24463
pmid: 27487815
The reaction mechanism of (E)‐methyl 3‐(2‐aminophenyl)acrylate (A) with phenylisothiocyanate (B) as well as the vital roles of substrateAand solvent water were investigated under unassisted, water‐assisted, substrateA‐assisted, and water‐A‐assisted conditions. The reaction proceeds with four processes via nucleophilic addition, deprotonation and protonation, intramolecular cyclization with hydrogen transfer, and keto–enol tautomerization. According to the different H‐shift mode, two possible types of H‐shift P1 and P2 are carefully investigated to identify the most preferred pathway, differing in the NH2group deprotonation and CH group ofAprotonation processes. It is found that substrateAand water not only act as reactant and solvent, but also as catalyst, proton shuttle, and stabilizer in effectively lowering the energy barrier. Therefore, the results demonstrate that the strong donating and accepting ability of NH2group onAand the presence of bulk water are the keys to the title reaction proceed. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
