Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2009
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Collagen vitrigel membranes for the in vitro reconstruction of separate corneal epithelial, stromal, and endothelial cell layers

Authors: McIntosh Ambrose, Winnette; Salahuddin, Afrah; So, Stephen; Ponce Márquez, Sara; Shengyong, Ng; Takezawa,, Toshiaki; Schein, Oliver; +1 Authors

Collagen vitrigel membranes for the in vitro reconstruction of separate corneal epithelial, stromal, and endothelial cell layers

Abstract

AbstractThe goal of this study was to evaluate the potential suitability of collagen Vitrigel (CV) membrane as a substrate for the separate reconstruction of the three main cellular layers of the cornea. Limbal explants, keratocytes, and endothelial cells were cultured on transparent membranes made of type I collagen. The resulting cell sheets were evaluated using RT‐PCR, in addition to light and electron microscopy. Tensile testing was also performed to examine the mechanical properties of CV. Limbal explant cultures resulted in partially stratified epithelial sheets with upregulation of the putative stem cell marker p63. Keratocytes cultured in serum on CV exhibited stellate morphology along with a marked increase in expression of corneal crystallin ALDH and keratocan, (a keratan sulphate proteoglycan: KSPG), compared to identical cultures on tissue culture plastic. Endothelial cells formed dense monolayers with uniform cell size, tight intercellular junctions, and expression of voltage‐dependent anion channels VDAC2 and VDAC3, chloride channel protein CLCN2, and sodium bicarbonate transporter NBC1. Epithelial and endothelial cells exhibited adhesive structures (desmosomes and hemidesmosomes) and evidence of apical specialization (microplicae), while endothelial cells also produced a Descemet's membrane‐like basal lamina. CV was found to possess ultimate tensile strengths of 6.8 ± 1.5 MPa when hydrated and 28.6 ± 7.0 MPa when dry. Taken together, these results indicate that CV holds promise as a substrate for corneal reconstruction. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2009

Keywords

Keratinocytes, Endothelial Cells, Membrane Proteins, Epithelial Cells, Membranes, Artificial, Desmosomes, In Vitro Techniques, Crystallins, Microscopy, Electron, Tensile Strength, Animals, Humans, Proteoglycans, Collagen, Rabbits, Stromal Cells, Gels

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    84
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
84
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%