
ABSTRACT An understanding of nesting tree characteristics is essential for the conservation of Critically Endangered White‐backed Vultures ( Gyps africanus ). To assess the influence of tree characteristics and tree health on White‐backed Vulture nest‐site selection, we measured a total of 205 trees (including vulture nest trees and randomly chosen trees) in Manyeleti and Kempiana Nature Reserves, South Africa. For each tree, we recorded trunk circumference at 1.3 m (CBH1) and 0.3 m (CBH2) above ground level, canopy width at its widest point, and total height. Tree health was evaluated based on trunk damage, including fire scars, insect infestation, fungal presence, and elephant debarking. Diospyros mespiliformis was the most frequently selected tree species (10.2% active nests). Most trees (74.2%) were healthy, 18.1% were unhealthy, and 7.8% were very unhealthy, primarily due to debarking by African savanna elephants ( Loxodonta africana ). There was no significant relationship between tree health status and vulture nest presence. Vultures prioritized tree size over tree health. Logistic regression identified trunk circumference as a key predictor ( p = 0.030, z value = 2.175), with larger trees associated with increased odds of nesting (coefficient: 0.587 ± 0.270), likely due to better support for the nests and higher elevation. However, insects and fungi reduced tree survival, and this was worsened by elephant damage. Conservation practitioners should focus on protecting Diospyros mespiliformis by managing elephant densities and controlling burns to mitigate vulture nesting tree damage and habitat stress.
Research Article
Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
