Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1002/cnm.3433
pmid: 33389785
AbstractDetecting malign cases from thyroid nodule examinations is crucial in healthcare particularly to improve the early detection of such cases. However, malign thyroid nodules can be extremely rare and is hard to find using the traditional rule based or expert‐based methods. For this reason, the solutions backed by Machine Learning (ML) algorithms are key to improve the detection rates of such rare cases. In this paper, we investigate the application of ML in the healthcare domain for the detection of rare thyroid nodules. The utilized dataset is collected from 636 distinct patients in 99 unique days in Turkey. In addition to the texture feature data of the Ultrasound (US), we have also included the scores of different assessment methods created by different health institutions (e.g., Korean, American and European thyroid societies) as additional features. For detection of extremely rare malign cases, we use auto‐encoder based neural network model. Through numerical results, it is shown that the auto‐encoder based model can result in an average Recall score of 0.98 and a Sensitivity score of 1.00 for detecting malign and non‐malign cases from the healthcare dataset outperforming the traditional classification algorithms that are trained after Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) oversampling.
malign, auto-encoder, Deep Learning, classification, semi-supervised deep learning, thyroid nodule, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Thyroid Nodule, Algorithms, Ultrasonography
malign, auto-encoder, Deep Learning, classification, semi-supervised deep learning, thyroid nodule, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Thyroid Nodule, Algorithms, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 19 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts