Downloads provided by UsageCounts
AbstractCulture media used in industrial bioprocessing and the emerging field of cellular agriculture is difficult to optimize due to the lack of rigorous mathematical models of cell growth and culture conditions, as well as the complexity of the design space. Rapid growth assays are inaccurate yet convenient, while robust measures of cell number can be time‐consuming to the point of limiting experimentation. In this study, we optimized a cell culture media with 14 components using a multi‐information source Bayesian optimization algorithm that locates optimal media conditions based on an iterative refinement of an uncertainty‐weighted desirability function. As a model system, we utilized murine C2C12 cells, using AlamarBlue, LIVE stain, and trypan blue exclusion cell counting assays to determine cell number. Using this experimental optimization algorithm, we were able to design media with 181% more cells than a common commercial variant with a similar economic cost, while doing so in 38% fewer experiments than an efficient design‐of‐experiments method. The optimal medium generalized well to long‐term growth up to four passages of C2C12 cells, indicating the multi‐information source assay improved measurement robustness relative to rapid growth assays alone.
570, multi‐information source, media optimization, Models, Biological, Industrial Biotechnology, ARTICLES, Mice, Models, cellular agriculture, Animals, Gaussian process, Bayesian optimization, 500, expected improvement, Agriculture, Bayes Theorem, Biological Sciences, Biological, Culture Media, multi-information source, mediaoptimization, Algorithms, Biotechnology
570, multi‐information source, media optimization, Models, Biological, Industrial Biotechnology, ARTICLES, Mice, Models, cellular agriculture, Animals, Gaussian process, Bayesian optimization, 500, expected improvement, Agriculture, Bayes Theorem, Biological Sciences, Biological, Culture Media, multi-information source, mediaoptimization, Algorithms, Biotechnology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 34 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 11 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts