Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1002/ajim.22123
pmid: 23023603
AbstractBackgroundLittle nationally representative information on job insecurity, work‐family imbalance, and hostile work environments experienced by workers in the US is available.MethodsPrevalence rates from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) were calculated for three workplace psychosocial factors (job insecurity, work‐family imbalance, bullying/harassment) using SUDAAN to account for the complex NHIS sample design.ResultsData were available for 17,524 adults who worked in the 12 months that preceded the interview. Overall prevalence rates were 31.7% for job insecurity, 16.3% for work‐family imbalance, and 7.8% for hostile work environment (being bullied or harassed). The highest prevalence rate of job insecurity was found for construction and extraction occupations. Workers in legal occupations had the highest prevalence rate of work‐family imbalance. Workers in protective service occupations had the highest prevalence rate of hostile work environment.ConclusionsWe identified demographic characteristics along with industries and occupations with the highest prevalence rates for three adverse workplace psychosocial factors. These data can be used for benchmarking and identification of targets for investigation and intervention activities. Am. J. Ind. Med. 56:660–669, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Adult, Male, Interprofessional Relations, Middle Aged, Health Surveys, Risk Assessment, Job Satisfaction, Interviews as Topic, Occupational Diseases, Hostility, Occupational Exposure, Prevalence, Humans, Industry, Psychology, Female, Family Relations, Occupations, Occupational Health, Stress, Psychological
Adult, Male, Interprofessional Relations, Middle Aged, Health Surveys, Risk Assessment, Job Satisfaction, Interviews as Topic, Occupational Diseases, Hostility, Occupational Exposure, Prevalence, Humans, Industry, Psychology, Female, Family Relations, Occupations, Occupational Health, Stress, Psychological
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 61 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 169 | |
| downloads | 50 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts