Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 11368/2919658 , 11562/992422 , 20.500.11770/298375 , 20.500.11767/48349
AbstractNeural interfaces are the core of prosthetic devices, such as implantable stimulating electrodes or brain–machine interfaces, and are increasingly designed for assisting rehabilitation and for promoting neural plasticity. Thus, beyond the classical neuroprosthetic concept of stimulating and/or recording devices, modern technology is pursuing toward ideal bio/electrode interfaces with improved adaptability to the brain tissue. Advances in material research are crucial in these efforts and new developments are drawing from engineering and neural interface technologies. Here, a microporous, self‐standing, 3D interface made of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) implemented at the interfacing surfaces with novel conductive nanotopographies (carbon nanotubes) is exploited. The scaffold porosity is characterized by 3D X‐ray microtomography. These structures are used to interface axons regenerated from cultured spinal explants and it is shown that engineering PDMS 3D interfaces with carbon nanotubes effectively changes the efficacy of regenerating fibers to target and reconnect segregated explant pairs. An improved electrophysiological performance is shown when the spinal tissue is interfaced to PDMS enriched by carbon nanotubes that may favor the use of our substrates as regenerative interfaces. The materials are implanted in the rat brain and a limited tissue reaction surrounding the implants at 2, 4, and 8 weeks from surgery is reported.
Spinal cord, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Material, 3D X-ray microtomography, Condensed Matter Physic, Biomaterial, Carbon nanotube, 3D X-ray microtomography; Carbon nanotubes; Elastomeric scaffolds; Electrophysiology; Organotypic cultures; Spinal cord; Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials; Biomaterials; Condensed Matter Physics; Electrochemistry, Electrophysiology, Elastomeric scaffold, spinal cord; nanomaterial; scaffold; regenerative medicine; electrophysiology; organotypic cultures; carbon nanotubes; in vivo test, 3D X-ray microtomography; carbon nanotubes; elastomeric scaffolds; electrophysiology; organotypic cultures; spinal cord, Electrochemistry, Organotypic culture
Spinal cord, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Material, 3D X-ray microtomography, Condensed Matter Physic, Biomaterial, Carbon nanotube, 3D X-ray microtomography; Carbon nanotubes; Elastomeric scaffolds; Electrophysiology; Organotypic cultures; Spinal cord; Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials; Biomaterials; Condensed Matter Physics; Electrochemistry, Electrophysiology, Elastomeric scaffold, spinal cord; nanomaterial; scaffold; regenerative medicine; electrophysiology; organotypic cultures; carbon nanotubes; in vivo test, 3D X-ray microtomography; carbon nanotubes; elastomeric scaffolds; electrophysiology; organotypic cultures; spinal cord, Electrochemistry, Organotypic culture
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 10 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts