
We perform a statistical analysis of curvelet coefficients, distinguishing between two classes of coefficients: those that contain a significant noise-free component, which we call the “signal of interest” and those that are primarily noise. This distinction is based on the fact that the noise-free component of the coefficients is typically more concentrated in the lower frequency bands, while the noise is more spread out. By modeling the distribution of the noise-free component, we can effectively remove the noise from the coefficients, leading to improved image denoising performance. The proposed method is evaluated on a variety of images and compared to state-of-the-art denoising techniques, demonstrating its effectiveness in removing noise while preserving image details.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
