
The history of publishing legal decisions in the UK has been privatised since its inception, spanning several hundred years. The privatised nature of law reporting has led to a lack of transparency and accessibility to legal information. This has significant implications for the administration of justice, as it can limit access to legal knowledge and hinder the ability of individuals to understand and navigate the legal system. The proposed research activity aims to explore the feasibility of providing free online access to UK law reports, with the goal of increasing transparency and accessibility to legal information. This would involve analyzing the current legal framework, identifying potential barriers to implementation, and developing strategies for overcoming these challenges. By providing free online access to UK law reports, this research activity seeks to promote greater transparency and accountability in the legal system, ultimately contributing to a more just and equitable society.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
