
Density measurements were carried out for aqueous solutions of two cationic surfactants: dodecylethyldimethylammonium bromide (C(12)(EDMAB)) and benzyldimethyldodecylammonium bromide (BDDAB). On the basis of the obtained results of the measurements the CMC and partial molar volumes of the surfactants studied were also determined. The obtained CMC values were also analyzed with those accounted on the basis of the surface tension data from the previous paper [J. Harkot, B. Jańczuk, J. Colloid Interface Sci. (2008), submitted for publication]. The values of CMC determined from the surface tension and density measurements for C(12)(EDMAB) are equal to 9.9x10(-3) and 1.5x10(-2) M and for BDDAB to 5.25x10(-3) and 5.3x10(-3) M, respectively. These obtained values are very similar. However, in the literature it is difficult to find the CMC values for C(12)(EDMAB) and BDDAB determined by these two methods used by us-especially from the density measurements for BDDAB and surface tension measurements for C(12)(EDMAB). In the case of the apparent molar volumes of C(12)(EDMAB) there is a good agreement between the values obtained by us and those found in the literature. The CMC values for C(12)(EDMAB) and BDDAB were also determined on the basis of their surface tension and free energy of electrostatic interactions between the polar heads of these surfactants and compared with those obtained from the surface tension and density measurements. It was found that the theoretically obtained CMC values were close to those determined from the density and surface tension data for the C(12)(EDMAB) and that the ratios of the CMC values of the surfactants to their concentration at which the water surface tension decreased by about 20 mN/m proved that the presence of the aryl group in the BDDAB head instead of the methyl group caused that its micellization process was more inhibited in relation to its adsorption at air-water interface than that of C(12)(EDMAB).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
