Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Role of the methylene backbone in the antiproliferative activity of polyamine analogues on L1210 cells.

Authors: R J, Bergeron; T R, Hawthorne; J R, Vinson; D E, Beck; M J, Ingeno;

Role of the methylene backbone in the antiproliferative activity of polyamine analogues on L1210 cells.

Abstract

The impact of the polyamine analogues, N1,N11-diethylnorspermine (DENSPM), N1,N12-diethylspermine (DESPM), and N1,N14-diethylhomospermine (DEHSPM) on the growth properties of L1210 murine leukemia cells is compared. The order of antiproliferative activity of the three compounds is shown to be DEHSPM greater than DESPM greater than DENSPM with average 96-h IC50 values of 0.06, 0.18, and 1.3 microM, respectively. Trypan blue exclusion suggests that the cytotoxic behavior of the compounds is not apparent until 96 h after exposure to the analogues. DEHSPM is shown to act more quickly and demonstrates the most profound cytotoxic effects at 144 h. Competitive uptake studies with spermidine reveal DESPM and DEHSPM to have essentially identical Ki values of 1.4 and 1.6 microM, respectively, while DENSPM indicates a substantially higher Ki value of 17 microM. Finally, although the analogues reduce the levels of putrescine, spermidine, and spermine in L1210 cells, if the concentration of polyamines in the cell, including analogues, is expressed on a nitrogen equivalence basis, the total cationic charge with which the polyamines are associated is conserved.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cell Survival, Antineoplastic Agents, DNA, Neoplasm, Binding, Competitive, Mice, Structure-Activity Relationship, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Animals, Spermine, Leukemia L1210, Cell Division

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    95
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
95
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!