Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Vitamin D and calcium-sensing receptor genotypes in men and premenopausal women with low bone mineral density.

Authors: Michael, Eckstein; Iris, Vered; Sophia, Ish-Shalom; Anat Ben, Shlomo; Avraham, Shtriker; Nira, Koren-Morag; Eitan, Friedman;

Vitamin D and calcium-sensing receptor genotypes in men and premenopausal women with low bone mineral density.

Abstract

Genetic factors have been shown to play a major role in the development of peak bone mass, with hereditability accounting for about 50-85% of the variance in bone mass. Numerous candidate genes involved in osteoporosis have been proposed, but the precise genes and their relative contribution remain unknown.To gain insight into the genetic basis of idiopathic low bone mineral density in Israeli patients by analyzing the impact of two candidate genes: polymorphism of the vitamin D receptor gene and polymorphism A986S in the calcium-sensing receptor gene.We analyzed 86 Jewish Israeli patients with LBMD: 38 premenopausal women and 48 men, and compared the allelic pattern distribution with that of the general population (126 men and 112 women). Genotyping of the VDR gene was performed in three polymorphic sites using restriction enzymes, and allelic analysis of A986S polymorphism in the CaSR gene was performed using the denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis technique.In LBMD women the distributions of VDR alleles in Apal polymorphism were AA = 7/28, Aa = 16/28 and aa = 5/28; in Taql polymorphism TT = 10/31, Tt = 16/31 and tt = 5/31; and in Bsml polymorphism BB = 7/32, Bb = 14/32 and 11/32. In LBMD men the distributions were AA = 17/39, Aa = 21/39 and aa = 1/39; in Taql polymorphism TT = 12/42, Tt = 23/42 and tt = 7/42; and in Bsml polymorphism BB = 12/41 Bb = 18/41 and bb = 11/32. The distributions of all these polymorphisms in the control groups were not significantly different. Adjusting for the independent age and gender parameters confirmed that these three polymorphisms of the VDR gene did not have a significant effect on bone mineral density. Thirty percent (24/79) of LBMD patients of either sex displayed heterozygosity of the CaSR A986S polymorphism, compared with 40 of 203 controls (19.7%) (P = 0.059). Adjusting for age and gender in these patients revealed a significant difference in the femoral neck BMD between homozygotes and heterozygotes (p = 0.002). The age at menarche of the LBMD women was found to predict 61% of the variance of femoral neck BMD.In Israeli Jewish men and premenopausal women VDR gene alleles do not seem to be associated with lower lumbar spine or femoral neck BMD. A trend towards heterozygosity for a CaSR polymorphism missense mutation was noted in the LBMD patients. Age at menarche in the LBMD women was found to be an important predictor of BMD. A significant difference was found between LBMD women and healthy control women towards heterozygosity for a CaSR polymorphism, as well as between homozygotes and heterozygotes for a CaSR polymorphism in BMD. The significance of these findings and their applicability to a larger population awaits further studies.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Adolescent, Genotype, Calcium-Binding Proteins, Age Factors, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Gene Frequency, Premenopause, Bone Density, Humans, Osteoporosis, Receptors, Calcitriol, Female, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!