Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Esophageal dilation.

Authors: T T, Nostrant; P S, Nandi;
Abstract

Esophageal dilation, a technique developed four centuries ago, continues to be an important method of treating the symptom of dysphagia in patients with luminal narrowing of the esophagus. Dilation is safe, with < 0.5% chance of perforation and bleeding and a 0.01% risk of death. Mercury bougienage (Maloney dilators), hollow polyvinyl dilators (Savary-Guillard), and balloon dilators (Through the Scope) are the principal types of dilators in use today. Few trials have compared the differing dilating methods. The results of these trials are mixed, and further randomized trials are necessary to determine if any technique has advantages in efficacy and cost. Although most patients successfully treated with dilation suffer with peptic strictures, those with nonpeptic strictures due to lower esophageal mucosal rings, corrosive injury, and radiation injury can also be treated effectively with dilation. By reviewing the current literature, effective treatment algorithms can be used with patients suffering from dysphagia due to various types of strictures.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Risk Factors, Esophageal Stenosis, Humans, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic, Dilatation, Algorithms

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!