Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

К объяснению одного курьезного факта из истории логики: учение Э. Енчмена о «Необходимости отмирания логики» как результат грубой ошибки при переходе от формальной аксиологии ценностей к формальной логике фактов

Authors: Lobovikov, V. O.;

К объяснению одного курьезного факта из истории логики: учение Э. Енчмена о «Необходимости отмирания логики» как результат грубой ошибки при переходе от формальной аксиологии ценностей к формальной логике фактов

Abstract

Принцип, известный под условным названием «гильотина Юма», подвергается экспликации на искусственном языке двузначной алгебры формальной аксио­логии. Результат экспликации прилагается к учению о логике как «ценности эксплуататорских классов». Предмет исследования - формально-аксиологи­ческий аспект этой концепции, обсуждающей ценности знания, мышления и логики. Метод исследования - дискретное математическое моделирование ука­занного аспекта теории Енчмена с помощью алгебры формальной аксиологии.

The principle, well-known as “Hume’s Guillotine”, is explicated by means of two-valued algebra of formal axiology. The result of explication is applied to the theory of logic as “a value of exploiting classes”. The subject-matter of investigation is a formal-axiological aspect of that theory, which discusses values of knowledge, thought and logic. The method of investigation is discrete mathematical modeling of the indicated aspect of Enchmen’s theory by means of algebra of formal axiology.

Keywords

АЛГЕБРА, ФУНКЦИЯ, AXIOLOGY, ДВУЗНАЧНАЯ, FORMAL, ФОРМАЛЬНАЯ, АКСИОЛОГИЯ, LOGIC, TWO-VALUED, FORMAL-AXIOLOGICAL-EQUIVALENCE, ЛОГИКА, ФОРМАЛЬНО-АКСИОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ ЭКВИВАЛЕНТНОСТЬ, EVALUATION-FUNCTION, ЦЕННОСТНАЯ, ALGEBRA

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!