Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Scientific Electroni...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Parto instrumental en cesárea anterior: importancia del intervalo interparto

Authors: Díaz Barreto, Heidy; Cusati Vásquez, Rosanna; Carrillo García, Hecna; Lara Croes, Aida;

Parto instrumental en cesárea anterior: importancia del intervalo interparto

Abstract

Objetivo: Evaluar la seguridad del parto instrumental en gestantes a término con antecedente de cesárea segmentaria entre 12 y 24 meses en trabajo de parto. Método: Estudio descriptivo, transversal y correlacional de 40 pacientes que iniciaron trabajo de parto espontáneamente entre marzo y octubre de 2005. Se atendieron mediante parto vaginal instrumental si la indicación de la cesárea previa no persistía. Se evaluó el intervalo interparto y el grosor del segmento uterino en relación a las dehiscencias. Ambiente: Maternidad “Concepción Palacios”, Caracas. Resultados: Tres pacientes presentaron dehiscencia del segmento uterino, 2 con intervalo interparto mayor a 18 meses, sin significancia estadística. Hubo diferencias significativas estadísticamente en cuanto a grosor del segmento, dosis total de oxitócico y tiempo del trabajo de parto. Conclusión: Después de los 12 meses de cesárea segmentaria el parto instrumental es recomendable en pacientes seleccionadas. Objective: To evaluate the safety of instrumental vaginal delivery in women with history of cesarean section between 12 to 24 month previous. Method: Descriptive, transversal and correlational study of 40 patients that spontaneously initiated labor between March and October 2005. Vaginal instrumental delivery was performed if the indication of previous cesarean section not persisted. Interdelivery interval and lower segment thickeess were evaluated in relation to dehiscence. Setting: Maternidad “Concepcion Palacios”, Caracas. Results: Three patients had dehiscence of uterine segment, 2 with an interval between deliveries greater than 18 months, without statistical significance. There were significant differences in relation to: lower segment thickness, total dose of oxitocyn and duration of labor. Conclusion: After 12 months of cesarean section, instrumental vaginal delivery is recommended in selected patients.

Keywords

Parto instrumental, Previous cesarean section, Interdelivery interval, Cesárea previa, Instrumental vaginal delivery, Intervalo interparto

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities