Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao University of Zadar ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Embodying the Monstrous in Doctor Who

Authors: Mofardin, Dora;

Embodying the Monstrous in Doctor Who

Abstract

U TV seriji Doctor Who, čudovišta i vanzemaljci su uvijek bili jedan od najvažnijih elemenata serije. U gotovo svakoj epizodi glavni problem dolazi zajedno sa čudovištem kojeg Doktor mora poraziti. Originalna ideja je bila da se izbjegne stvaranje jednostavnih zelenih vanzemaljaca s velikim očima i da se, naprotiv, razne vrste čudovišta opiše kao kompleksna bića s izrazitim karakteristikama. Kao rezultat toga, u seriji se kroz vrijeme pojavio velik broj različitih vrsta vanzemaljaca. Cilj ovog rada je analizirati čudovišta iz serije koristeći se teorijskim okvirom J. J. Cohena prikazanom u njegovom eseju Monster Theory. Najprije govorimo o značenju monstruoznosti kroz povijest te potom objašnjavamo kako čudovište funkcionira u suvremenijim narativima, posebno u djelima znanstvene fantastike. Glavna analiza se fokusira na Cohenovih sedam teza i ispitivanju kako se primjeri iz serije uklapaju u datu teoriju. Osnovna misao Cohenovog eseja je ta da kulture možemo proučavati kroz čudovišta koja stvaraju. Prema tome, kroz analizu raznih vrsta vanzemaljaca iz serije Doctor Who, bolje ćemo razumjeti Britansku kulturu i možemo povući paralele između radnje iz serije i društvenih i političkih zbivanja iz stvarnog života.

In the TV series Doctor Who, the monsters and aliens have always been one of the most important elements of the show. In almost every episode the main problem is introduced by the appearance of a monster which the Doctor has to defeat. The original idea was to avoid portraying simple green bug-eyed monsters, but instead write the monsters as complex creatures with distinct characteristics. As a result, the show introduced a large number of various alien creatures over the years. The goal of this paper is to analyse the monsters from the series using J. J. Cohen’s theoretical framework given in his essay Monster Theory. First we talk about the meaning of monstrosity throughout history, then we explain how the monster functions in more contemporary narratives, especially in works of science fiction. The main analysis focuses on Cohen’s seven theses and examining how the examples from the show fit the given theory. The main idea of Cohen’s essay is that we can study cultures through the monsters they create. Therefore, by analysing the various alien species of Doctor Who, we can better understand British culture and draw parallels between storylines on the show, and social and political events in real life.

Country
Croatia
Related Organizations
Keywords

HUMANISTIC SCIENCES. Philology., science fiction, znanstvena fantastik, kultura, Doctor Who, Monster Theory, HUMANISTIČKE ZNANOSTI. Filologija., otherness, drugost, culture

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!