Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Fluctuations of the Black Sea level in Neoeuxine-Holocene versus catastrophic flood hypothesis

Authors: Konikov, E.; Faschevsky, S.; Pedan, G.;

Fluctuations of the Black Sea level in Neoeuxine-Holocene versus catastrophic flood hypothesis

Abstract

?? ???????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?? ???????????????????????????? ?? ?????????????????? ???????????? ?????????????? ???????? ?? ?????????????????????? (18 ??? 9,2 ??????. ??. ??.) ?? ???????????????? (9,2 ??? 0,0 ??????.??.??.), ?????????????????????? ?? ?????????? ?? ?????????????????? ??. ???????????? ?? ?????????????????? (1997, 2001) ?? ?????????????????????????????????? ??????????????. ???? ?????????????????? ???????????????? ?????????????????????????? ?????????????? ??????????????????, ??????????????????????????????, ???????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????? ?? ???????????? ?? ???????????????????? ?????????????? ?? ?????????????????? ?????????????? ?????? ???? ???????????????? ???????????? ?????????????????????? (?????????? 200 ??????????????) ?? ?????????????????????????????? (?????????? 1000 ??????????????) ?????????????? ???? ???????????? ?? ?? ?????????????????????????????? ?????????????? ???????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????? ?????????????? ????????????????. ?????????????????? ????????????????????????????, ?????????????????????????? ?????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ?????????????? ???? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????????????????????? ????????????????????????, ?? ?????????? ???? ???????????????????? ????????????????.

?? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ?????? ???????????????????????????? ???? ???????????????????? ?????????? ?????????????? ???????? ???? ?????????????????????? (18???9,2 ??????. ??. ??.) ???? ???????????????? (9,2???0,0 ??????.??.??.) , ?????? ?????????????????????????? ?? ??????????????? ?? ?????????????????? ??. ???????????? ?? ?????????????????????? (1997, 2003) ?????? ??????????????????????????????? ?????????????. ???? ???????????????? ???????????????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????? ??????????????????, ??????????????????????????????, ???????????????????????????????? ?????????????????? ???? ?????????? ?????? ???????????????? ?????????? ?? ?????????????????? ?????????????? ?????? ???? ???????????????? ???????????? ?????????????????????? (???????? 200 ????????????????????) ???? ?????????????????????????????? (???????? 1000 ????????????????????) ?????????????? ???? ???????????? ???? ?? ???????????????????????????????? ?????????????? ???????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????? ???????????????? ???????????? ?????????????????????????????? ?????????????? ??????????????. ???????????????? ????????????, ???? ???????????????????? ?????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????? ??????????????? ???? ???????????????? ?????????? ?????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????, ?? ?????????? ???????????????? ????????????????.

This paper presents the pictures of paleogeography and variations of sea level of the Black Sea basin in Neoeuxinian and Holocenian stages under discussion relative to the hypothesis of catastrophic flooding presented by Ryan W et.al. (1997, 2001). Based on lithologic genetic analysis of sediments, biostratigraphy, absolute dating tests and chemical composition of interstitual water on the shelf and estuaries, paleographyc maps for the main events of the Late Neoeuxinian Holocenian history of basin was constracted. It is given evedences against probability of catastrophic flooding in the early stage of Neoeuxinian transgression and over Holocene.

Keywords

???????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ????????????????

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!