Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Logiko-filosofskie s...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

От Слинина к Кэрроллу и обратно: апофатика и нонсенс как предпосылки логического анализа

Authors: Tulchinsky, Grigory;

От Слинина к Кэрроллу и обратно: апофатика и нонсенс как предпосылки логического анализа

Abstract

Logic and logical semantics are traditionally oriented towards the analysis of extensive (referential) relations between sets of entities that form the subject area of reasoning. Thus, incompatibility, identity, intersection, inclusion (genus vs. species) are relations between the extensions of concepts, i.e. relations between the corresponding sets. In this case, the fundamental assumption is that the universe is not empty. Such an attitude is characteristic of the general attitude of European rationalism towards positive knowledge, fuelled by the cataphatic semantic picture of the world. The extension of logical analysis to modal, intensional, and epistemic contexts posed the task of clarifying the content of such ontological assumptions. Such a refinement was the development of a wide range of semantics of “possible worlds”, the apparatus of logic, free from existential (ontological) assumptions. In this paper, we consider the possibility of an “apophatic” extension of logical analysis to judgements with negative predicates, which goes back to the logic of Lewis Carroll, which makes it possible to obtain a number of non-trivial generalizations.

В логике и логической семантике традиционно реализуется установка на анализ экстенсивных (референциальных) отношений между совокупностями сущностей, образующих предметную область рассуждения. Так, несовместимость, тождество, пересечение, включение (рода и вида) есть отношения между объемами понятий как отношения между соответствующими множествами. При этом принципиальным является предположение о непустоте предметной области. Такая установка сообразна общей установке европейского рационализма на позитивное знание, подпитываемой катафатичностью смысловой картины мира. Расширение логического анализа на модальные, интенсиональные и эпистемические контексты потребовало уточнить содержания подобных онтологических допущений, результатом чего стали разработка широкого спектра семантики «возможных миров», аппарата логики, свободной от экзистенциальных (онтологических) допущений. В данной работе рассматривается возможность «апофатического» расширения логического анализа на суждения с отрицательными предикатами, восходящего к логике Льюиса Кэрролла, что позволяет получить ряд нетривиальных обобщений.

Keywords

apophatic; cataphatic; logical semantics; Lewis Carroll; negation; syllogistic; Yaroslav Slinin, апофатика; катафатика; логическая семантика; Льюис Кэрролл; отри- цание; силлогистика; Я. А. Слинин

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid