Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of the Effect of Moxifloxacin and Gatifloxacin on Corneal Epithelial Wound Healing in the Rabbit Model

Authors: Bernard E McCarey; Henry F Edelhauser; K Keven Williams;

Comparison of the Effect of Moxifloxacin and Gatifloxacin on Corneal Epithelial Wound Healing in the Rabbit Model

Abstract

Purpose: Comeal epithelial wound closure rates in rabbit eyes were compared after topical applications of moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution, gatifloxacin 0.3% ophthalmic solution, and BSS Sterile Irrigating Solution. Methods: Thirty rabbits were divided into 3 randomization groups of 10 rabbits each. Animals in each randomization group were predosed 4 times a day with a different test article in each eye for 1 day before surgery. Group 1 animals received BSS in 1 eye and moxifloxacin in the other eye; group 2 animals received BSS in 1 eye and gatifloxacin in the other eye; and group 3 animals received moxifloxacin in 1 eye and gatifloxacin in the other eye, resulting in each test article's being administered to 20 eyes. Rabbits underwent a bilateral procedure to remove the full thickness of the central comeal epithelium within a 5-mm trephine mark. After wounding, the eyes were dosed 4 times a day with the same respective predose test articles, and epithelial wound closure was recorded using slit-lamp photography. The data were analyzed to determine the rate of wound closure. Results: The mean wound radius closure rate was 71.1 ± 11.7 μm/h for BSS-treated eyes, 67.6 ± 7.1 μm/h for moxifloxacin-treated eyes, and 65.9 ± 8.0 μm/h for gatifloxacin-treated eyes. Conclusions: The relative order of wound healing rates was BSS > moxifloxacin > gatifloxacin; however, differences between treatment groups were not considered significant.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!