
Stock market or individual stock forecasting poses a significant challenge due to the influence of uncertainty and dynamic conditions in financial markets. Traditional methods, such as fundamental and technical analysis, have been limited in coping with uncertainty. In recent years, this has led to a growing interest in using deep learning-based models for stock prediction. However, the accuracy and reliability of these models depend on correctly implementing a series of critical steps. These steps include data collection and analysis, feature extraction and selection, noise elimination, model selection and architecture determination, choice of training-test approach, and performance evaluation. This study systematically examined deep learning-based stock forecasting models in the literature, investigating the effects of these steps on the model’s forecasting performance. This review focused on the studies between 2020–2024, identifying influential studies by conducting a systematic literature search across three different databases. The identified studies regarding seven critical steps essential for creating successful and reliable prediction models were thoroughly examined. The findings from these examinations were summarized in tables, and the gaps in the literature were detailed. This systematic review not only provides a comprehensive understanding of current studies but also serves as a guide for future research.
Human-Computer Interaction, Denoising, Electronic computers. Computer science, Feature selection, Stock forecasting, Feature extraction, Deep learning, QA75.5-76.95, Sliding window
Human-Computer Interaction, Denoising, Electronic computers. Computer science, Feature selection, Stock forecasting, Feature extraction, Deep learning, QA75.5-76.95, Sliding window
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
