
doi: 10.3390/en11040766
This paper suggests an innovative approach for the ideal placement and categorization of capacitors in radial distribution networks (RDNs) by applying symmetric fuzzy and improved bacterial foraging optimization algorithm (IBFOA) solutions. The reactive power reimbursement significantly enhances the function of the power system, and capacitor placement is an impressive technique used to reduce loss of the system. The capacitor allocation for distribution system problems involves determining the ideal location and size of the capacitor. In this work, load flow is performed at first to compute actual losses and voltages at different nodes without compensation. In the planned technique, the loss sensitivity factor (VSF) and voltage stability index (VSI) are utilized to determine the optimal location of capacitors in RDNs. Here, the IBFOA is used to determine the proper rating of the capacitor. The suggested scheme is applied on three different types of RDNs.
Technology, improved bacterial foraging algorithm, capacitor placement, T, load flow, fuzzy modeling; improved bacterial foraging algorithm; load flow; capacitor placement; voltage stability index; loss sensitivity factor, loss sensitivity factor, voltage stability index, fuzzy modeling
Technology, improved bacterial foraging algorithm, capacitor placement, T, load flow, fuzzy modeling; improved bacterial foraging algorithm; load flow; capacitor placement; voltage stability index; loss sensitivity factor, loss sensitivity factor, voltage stability index, fuzzy modeling
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
