
A new trend to assign some authors as 'first co-authors' is noticeable in scientific publications as a statement highlighting that two or more authors 'contributed equally' to a reported work. However, the requirements of scientific rigor, honesty, and accuracy in academic standards make such statements invalid and, thus, should be avoided. A potential solution is to specify the role of each co-author, from study conception to communication of results, and let readers judge the importance of each contribution by themselves. Alternatively, authors should demonstrate how they contributed 'equally' when they are defined as 'equal contributors'.
bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, bepress|Engineering, Arabixiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, FOS: Law, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Education, bepress|Business, bepress|Life Sciences, Engineering, bepress|Architecture, Architecture, Arabixiv|Engineering, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Medicine and Health Sciences, Arabixiv|Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, Business, Life Sciences, bepress|Medicine and Health Sciences, Arabixiv|Law, Arabixiv|Education, bepress|Law, Authorship, Arabixiv|Architecture, Arabixiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, bepress|Education, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Arabixiv|Business, Arts and Humanities, Arabixiv|Arts and Humanities, Periodicals as Topic, Law, bepress|Arts and Humanities, Editorial Policies, FOS: Civil engineering, Arabixiv|Life Sciences
bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, bepress|Engineering, Arabixiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, FOS: Law, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Education, bepress|Business, bepress|Life Sciences, Engineering, bepress|Architecture, Architecture, Arabixiv|Engineering, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Medicine and Health Sciences, Arabixiv|Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, Business, Life Sciences, bepress|Medicine and Health Sciences, Arabixiv|Law, Arabixiv|Education, bepress|Law, Authorship, Arabixiv|Architecture, Arabixiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, bepress|Education, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Arabixiv|Business, Arts and Humanities, Arabixiv|Arts and Humanities, Periodicals as Topic, Law, bepress|Arts and Humanities, Editorial Policies, FOS: Civil engineering, Arabixiv|Life Sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
