Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Impact of genotype and mutation type on health-related quality of life in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia

Authors: Paul-Stefan Mauz; Ilse M. Zalaman; Gunnar Blumenstock; Ingo Baumann; Markus Pfister;

Impact of genotype and mutation type on health-related quality of life in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia

Abstract

Patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia genotype ALK-1 (HHT2-ALK-1) with nonsense mutation demonstrated tendentially higher health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) scores than patients with HHT with genotype ENG (HHT1-ENG) with missense mutation.HHT, also known as Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome, comprises different expressions depending on genetic type and mutation type. The influence of HHT type on HR-QOL has not been established and is addressed in this paper.A total of 94 patients with confirmed diagnoses of HHT (Curaçao criteria) participated in this study. EDTA (ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid) blood samples of 24 patients were sequenced genetically into genotype HHT1 (ENG) vs HHT2 (ALK-1) and mutation type missense vs nonsense. HR-QOL was assessed with the German Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36).HHT2 patients (genotype ALK-1) demonstrated significantly higher physical component scores than HHT1 patients (effect size d=0.62). Patients with genotype ENG (HHT1) with nonsense mutations showed significantly higher mental component scores than patients with missense mutations (effect size=0.79).

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Genotype, Activin Receptors, Type II, Endoglin, Mutation, Missense, Receptors, Cell Surface, Middle Aged, Health Surveys, Young Adult, Antigens, CD, Codon, Nonsense, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?