Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Contraceptionarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Contraception
Article . 1994 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Contraception
Article . 1994
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Once-a-month injectable contraceptives: efficacy and reasons for discontinuation

Authors: Suporn Koetsawang;

Once-a-month injectable contraceptives: efficacy and reasons for discontinuation

Abstract

Reports of the phase III clinical trials on four combined progestogen-estrogen once-a-month injectable contraceptives, Deladroxate, Cyclofem, Mesigyna and Chinese Injectable No. 1, are reviewed focussing on efficacy and reasons for discontinuation. Deladroxate, currently used in many Latin American countries has proved to be highly effective and well accepted. However, this combination was withdrawn by the original manufacturer because the progestogen component of this drug induced a high number of breast cancers in dogs and very curious pituitary hyperplasia in rats. Cyclofem and Mesigyna were found to be highly effective and highly acceptable drugs. Side-effects were minimal and were of minor importance. The Chinese Injectable No. 1 had unacceptably high failure rates with a monthly injection schedule. After doubling the dose in the first month of use, the efficacy was satisfactory. It was found that all monthly injectable contraceptives provided better cycle control than the every 3 months depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, although abnormal bleeding was still the main drug-related complaint and reason for discontinuation. Missed appointment is another reason for discontinuation which might reflect the problem of frequent injection schedule, thus indicating the need for proper selection of the users and good counselling.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Estradiol, Algestone Acetophenide, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, Injections, Intramuscular, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Drug Combinations, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Delayed-Action Preparations, 17 alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate, Contraceptive Agents, Female, Hydroxyprogesterones, Humans, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Female, Norethindrone, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
22
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!