Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Objective versus human observer detection of 40-Hz auditory-evoked potentials

Authors: R A, Dobie; M J, Wilson;

Objective versus human observer detection of 40-Hz auditory-evoked potentials

Abstract

Magnitude-squared coherence (MSC) was used to detect 40-Hz auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) in a two-alternative forced-choice experiment. MSC performance was found to be better than that of ten human observers. Experienced observers did not perform better than naive observers. In a ‘‘yes–no’’ experiment, observers demonstrated large differences in criterion, with false-positive rates of 2%–20%. Observers also performed better when AEPs were presented in a 50-ms window (two response cycles) than when presented in a 205-ms window (eight response cycles), although total test time was the same; MSC performed equally well in both cases. MSC provides a useful and objective adjunct to visual detection of 40-Hz AEPs.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Observer Variation, Hearing, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!