Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Abstract 16457: Racial/Ethnic Differences in Cardiac Surveillance Evaluation for Cancer Patients Treated With Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy: The Oneflorida Clinical Research Consortium

Authors: Nam K Nguyen; Michael G Fradley; Yiqing Chen; David DeRemer; Nida Waheed; Taimour Y Langaee; Faraz S Ahmad; +3 Authors

Abstract 16457: Racial/Ethnic Differences in Cardiac Surveillance Evaluation for Cancer Patients Treated With Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy: The Oneflorida Clinical Research Consortium

Abstract

Introduction: Anthracyclines remain a key treatment for many malignancies but can increase the risk of heart failure or cardiomyopathy. Different guidelines recommend echocardiography (echo) and BNP or NT-proBNP evaluation before and 6-12 months after treatment. It is unknown however if racial/ethnic disparities exist in the cardiac surveillance of cancer survivors exposed to anthracyclines. Hypothesis: Racial/ethnic disparities are present in the adoption rates of cardiac surveillance guidelines among survivors treated with anthracyclines. Methods: Adult patients in the OneFlorida Consortium without prior cardiovascular disease who received at least 2 cycles of anthracyclines were included in the analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for receiving echo, BNP or NT-proBNP at 6 months prior (baseline), 6 months after (6M), and 12 months after (12M) treatment among different racial/ethnic groups. Results: A total of 2758 patients were identified, with mean age of 54 ± 16 years and 60% were women. Among the entire cohort, 43% had a baseline echo, with 18% receiving an echo at 6M and 21% at 12M. BNP or NT-proBNP were lower: 5.3% at baseline, 6.5% at 6M and 8.7% at 12M. The prevalence of baseline cardiovascular risk factors ranged from 13% for hyperlipidemia and diabetes to 19% for obesity and 29% for hypertension. Compared to Whites, Blacks (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.45-0.70) and Hispanics (0.52, 0.43-0.64) were less likely to receive echo surveillance at baseline. These differences were also observed at 6M and 12M in Hispanics (Figure). Conclusions: Significant racial/ethnic differences in cardiac surveillance among cancer survivors were present before and after anthracycline-based treatment as Hispanics are least likely to receive cardiac surveillance. This points to the need for improved education and outreach to ensure all cancer survivors receive appropriate and equitable care.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!