<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Searching for the longest common substring (LCS) of biosequences is one of the most important tasks in Bioinformatics. A fast algorithm for LCS problem named FAST_LCS is presented. The algorithm first seeks the successors of the initial identical character pairs according to a successor table to obtain all the identical pairs and their levels. Then by tracing back from the identical character pair at the largest level, the result of LCS can be obtained. For two sequences X and Y with lengths n and m, the memory required for FAST_LCS is max{8*(n+1)+8*(m+1),L}, here L is the number of identical character pairs and time complexity of parallel implementation is O(|LCS(X,Y)|), here, |LCS(X,Y)| is the length of the LCS of X,Y. Experimental result on the gene sequences of tigr database using MPP parallel computer Shenteng 1800 shows that our algorithm can get exact correct result and is faster and more efficient than other LCS algorithms. bioinformatics; longest common subsequence; identical character pair Wei Liu ,* 1 , Lin Chen 3 , 2 1 Institute of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210093, China 2 Department of Computer Science, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China 3 State Key Lab of Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China * Corresponding author, Address: P.O. Box 274, Institute of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 29 Yudao ST., Nanjing, 210093, P. R. China, Email: yzliuwei@126.com
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |