Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Differences in Drug Treatment Services Based on Profit Status

Authors: Isaac D, Montoya;

Differences in Drug Treatment Services Based on Profit Status

Abstract

The goal of this article is to examine whether profit status affects the provision of seven "core" drug treatment services and nine "auxiliary" treatment services. Data on the type of services provided by 8,606 treatment providers obtained from the National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS) collected by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) in 2000 were used for this study. The types of services offered by the providers were modeled to be a function of the drug treatment providers' (DTP) profit status, DTP organizational and financial characteristics, staff's characteristics, clients' characteristics, and regional variables. A total of 16 logistic regressions were estimated. For-profit DTPs were found to be more likely to offer only two core services and were less likely to offer eight auxiliary services. However, after correcting for sample selection bias many differences in the supply of services between for-profit and nonprofit providers disappeared.

Keywords

Adult, Counseling, Male, Insurance, Health, Adolescent, Substance-Related Disorders, Data Collection, Health Status, Ownership, Middle Aged, Socioeconomic Factors, Child, Preschool, Ethnicity, Humans, Female, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Algorithms, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!