
Though Vaccines are instrumental in global health, mitigating infectious diseases and pandemic outbreaks, they can occasionally lead to adverse events (AEs). Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in effectively identifying and cataloging AEs within clinical reports. Utilizing data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from 1990 to 2016, this study particularly focuses on AEs to evaluate LLMs’ capability for AE extraction. A variety of prevalent LLMs, including GPT-2, GPT-3 variants, GPT-4, and Llama2, were evaluated using Influenza vaccine as a use case. The fine-tuned GPT 3.5 model (AE-GPT) stood out with a 0.704 averaged micro F1 score for strict match and 0.816 for relaxed match. The encouraging performance of the AE-GPT underscores LLMs’ potential in processing medical data, indicating a significant stride towards advanced AE detection, thus presumably generalizable to other AE extraction tasks.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Computation and Language, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Science, Q, R, Alanine Transaminase, Disease Outbreaks, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Influenza Vaccines, Influenza, Human, Medicine, Humans, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Computation and Language (cs.CL), Research Article
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Computation and Language, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Science, Q, R, Alanine Transaminase, Disease Outbreaks, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Influenza Vaccines, Influenza, Human, Medicine, Humans, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Computation and Language (cs.CL), Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
