Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Pathologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Pathology
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Pathology
Article . 2000
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Detection of false-negative papanicolaou smears by rapid rescreening in a large routine cervical cytology laboratory

Authors: R G, Wright; J A, Halford; E J, Ditchmen;

Detection of false-negative papanicolaou smears by rapid rescreening in a large routine cervical cytology laboratory

Abstract

Rapid rescreening was established in our laboratory in 1995, following the publication of several studies indicating improved sensitivity for the detection of abnormalities in cervical smears. During the study period, 285,841 negative smears (representing 89.09% of the total workload) were rapidly rescreened. A total of 7,650 (2.68%) were identified as abnormal or suspicious and selected for full rescreening. Of these, 228 cases were considered abnormal following pathologist review and resulted in the issue of an amended report. This represents an increased detection rate for all abnormalities of 0.08%. Of the cases with histological follow-up, a high grade epithelial abnormality (HGEA) was confirmed in 31% of cases and a low grade epithelial abnormality (LGEA) in 42%. We conclude that rapid rescreening is easily incorporated into the daily workflow of a large routine cervical cytology laboratory, Our results support conclusions from previous studies that rapid rescreening is an effective quality control technique resulting in the detection of increased numbers of abnormal smears.

Keywords

Quality Control, Vaginal Smears, Humans, Mass Screening, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Epithelial Cells, Female, False Negative Reactions, Papanicolaou Test

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!