Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Percutaneous Choledochoscopy and Cholecystoscopy: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Uses

Authors: J H, Siegel; L F, Mayer;

Percutaneous Choledochoscopy and Cholecystoscopy: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Uses

Abstract

Accessibility to the common bile duct and gallbladder through sinus tracts formed after placement of a T-tube or cholecystostomy tube at surgery has until recently been restricted to special catheters and accessories for the extraction of stones. The procedure requires continuous fluoroscopy while contrast media is injected in order to identify defects and to place accessories. More recently this techniques has been accomplished with endoscopes which are advanced into the bile duct through these tracts. The results are comparable to the catheter technique but exposure to x-ray is reduced. The procedure has been performed with a bronchoscope (BF-4B2-Olympus Corporation of America), modified with an irrigation-suction valve, permitting direct examination, biopsy and entrapment of stones. With the bronchoscope in the bile duct, physiologic function and pathologic conditions can be assessed by advancing catheters through the ampulla into the duodenum, 1) the former to facilitate manometric recordings and, 2) the latter to calibrate the opening of the papilla. A catheter passed antegrade through the bronchoscope into the duodenum can be used as a guide for the simultaneous performance of sphincterotomy while the duodenoscope is in position. These new applications have placed choledochoscopy and cholecystoscopy in the armamentarium for the evaluation and treatment of biliary tract disease.

Keywords

Common Bile Duct, Biliary Tract Diseases, Gallbladder, Humans, Endoscopy, Bile Duct Diseases, Gallbladder Diseases, Gallstones, Duodenoscopy, Catheterization

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!