Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Soluble IL-2 Receptor α Is a More Sensitive Diagnostic Biomarker Than β2 Microglobulin and Predicts Survival in Follicular Lymphoma: Retrospective Analysis of 305 Cases

Authors: Akio Saito; Morio Sawamura; Kotaro Toyama; Hiroshi Handa; Makiko Takizawa; Takayuki Saito; Akihiko Yokohama; +14 Authors

Soluble IL-2 Receptor α Is a More Sensitive Diagnostic Biomarker Than β2 Microglobulin and Predicts Survival in Follicular Lymphoma: Retrospective Analysis of 305 Cases

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Soluble-form IL-2 receptor α (sIL-2Rα) has been identified as a significant prognostic biomarker in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) treated using rituximab-containing regimens. However, the clinical significance of sIL-2R is not fully understood, especially in subtypes of NHL, such as follicular lymphoma (FL). In addition to sIL-2Rα, β2-microglobulin (B2M) has been used as a prognostic and diagnostic biomarker of FL. We compared the predictive and diagnostic abilities of sIL-2Rα and B2M for FL. Patients and Methods: We analyzed 305 patients newly diagnosed with FL (Grade1-3a) between January 2001 and July 2012. Levels of sIL-2Rα and B2M were evaluated at diagnosis. The optimal cut-off values of sIL-2Rα and B2M were calculated from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS, death from any cause, relapse and refractory disease) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and survival was compared using log-rank tests. To estimate the survival impact of several factors including sIL-2Rα, B2M, Hb<12g/dl, B symptoms, LDH, bone marrow involvement, bulky disease, extranodal disease and age, we performed multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Median age was 59 years (range: 28-86 years) and the male: female ratio was 1:1. Most (245/305) patients were treated with chemotherapy regimens. Rituximab was concomitantly administered to 227 of these patients (R-Chemo) and 52 of these patients received rituximab maintenance for 2 years. In the 305patients, clinical stage was I in 12.3%, II in 15.1%, III in 24.9%, and IV in 45.9% and the Follicular Lymphoma Prognostic Index was low in 35.7%, intermediate in 27.2% and high in 36.7%. The median follow-up period was 1,516 days (range: 7 - 4,776 days). The median sIL-2Rα value was 1,107.5 U/L (range: 127-20,800 U/L) and the median B2M value was 2.2 mg/L (range: 1.0-10.29). The 3-year OS of the entire population was 87.8% and the 3-year PFS was 65.1%. The percentage of patients whose sIL-2Rα or B2M level was higher than the upper normal limit (520 U/L for sIL-2Rα, 2.0 mg/L for B2M) at diagnosis was higher for sIL-2R (76.8%) than for B2M (54.2%) patients (p<0.0001), indicating that sIL2Rα is more sensitive diagnostic marker for FL than B2M. To estimate the predictive value of sIL-2Rα and B2M for survival, we determined the optimal cut-off levels of sIL-2Rα and B2M using ROC analysis. This analysis showed that sIL-2Rα and B2M values of 1,700 U/L and 2.2mg/Lrespectivelywere the most sensitive and specific values for prediction of a 3-year PFS. Using these values, patients were separated into two significantly different groups of sIL-2Rα values (>1,700 U/L and ≤1,700 (p<0.0001)) and of B2M values (>2.2 mg/L and ≤ 2.2 mg/L (p=0.0017)). Further, PFS differed significantly between patients with sIL-2Rα values of >520 U/L and ≤520 U/L, >1,000 U/L and ≤1,000 U/L ,and >2,000 U/L and ≤2,000 U/L (p=0.03, 0.0003 and <0.0001, respectively) and also between patients with B2M values of >2.0 mg/L and ≤2.0 mg/L, >2.5 mg/L and ≤2.5 mg/L, >3.0 mg/L and ≤3.0 mg/L (p=0.011, 0.0016 and 0.0184, respectively). Univariate analysis identified several reported prognostic factors, such as clinical stage3-4, B2M>2.2 mg/L, number of nodal site>5, bone marrow involvement, Hb<12 g/dl, performance status<2, number of extranodal site>1, longest diameter>6 cm (<0.0001, 0.002, 0.0002, 0.0204, 0.0345, 0.0089, 0.0004 and 0.0053, respectively) in addition to sIL-2Rα (p<0.0001). Cox multivariate analysis indicated sIL-2Rα as a significant prognostic factor (p=0.0361), in addition to several other factors (bone marrow involvement, number of extranodal site<2, number of nodal site>5). In the group treated with the R-chemo regimen, the 3-year OS was 86.9% and the 3-year PFS was 64.9%. Within this group, PFS significantly differed between the two groups of sIL-2Rα; >1,700 U/L and ≤1,700 (p<0.0001), and between two groups with different B2M values >2.2 mg/L and ≤ 2.2 mg/L (p=0.0056). Again, multivariate analysis showed that sIL-2Rα (>1,700 U/L), in addition to several other factors, was associated with poorer prognosis. Conclusion: This study showed that sIL-2Rα is a more sensitive diagnostic biomarker of FL than B2M. In terms of survival, sIL-2R is an important risk factor of FL, not only for all patients with FL, but also in the R-Chemo era. Disclosures Handa: Celgene: Research Funding; Yakult: Research Funding; Kirin: Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!