Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Ibrutinib, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab (GA101) (iFCG) for previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with mutated IGHV and non-del (17p).

Authors: Nitin Jain; Philip A. Thompson; Jan Andreas Burger; Gautam Borthakur; Prithviraj Bose; Zeev Estrov; Alessandra Ferrajoli; +7 Authors

Ibrutinib, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab (GA101) (iFCG) for previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with mutated IGHV and non-del (17p).

Abstract

7522 Background: Pts with mutated IGHV ( IGHV-M) have favorable long-term outcomes after FCR. Methods: We designed an investigator-initiated phase II trial with ibrutinib, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab (iFCG) for previously untreated pts with IGHV-M CLL (NCT02629809). The intent was to limit FC to 3 courses, potentially reducing short- and long-term toxicity, while maintaining efficacy through addition of ibrutinib and obinutuzumab. Key eligibility included age ≥18, IGHV-M, no del17p. Pts received 3 courses of iFCG. G-CSF was not mandated. Primary endpoint: CR/CRi with bone marrow (BM) MRD-neg (4-color flow-cytometry) after 3 courses of iFCG. Pts meeting primary endpoint received ibrutinib with obinutuzumab (iG) for C3-6, then ibrutinib C7-12. Pts not achieving primary endpoint received iG (C4-12). All pts who are MRD neg at 1 year will stop all therapy, including ibrutinib. Pts MRD+ at 1 year may continue ibrutinib. Historic C3 BM MRD-neg with FCR in IGHV-M 26% (Strati, Blood 2014). Target BM MRD-neg after iFCG x3 is 45%. Sample size 45. Results: 23 pts started treatment. Median age 59 yrs (25-71). Prognostic markers [del13q (n=17), negative (n=3); trisomy 12 (n=3)]. 18 pts completed 3 courses of iFCG and had initial response assessment (the remaining 5 pts too early). All 18 pts had a response; 14/18 (78%) achieved MRD-neg in BM at 3 month with 7/18 achieving CR/CRi (all MRD neg). No pt has progressed, and all but one continue to receive treatment. Of the 23 pts, 11 pts had G3-4 neutropenia and 5 pts had G3-4 thrombocytopenia. 4 pt had neutropenic fever. 1 pt who achieved MRD-neg CR developed pulmonary MAC infection, and declined further therapy. 1 pt had atrial fibrillation. G3 ALT developed in 3 pts. FC was dose reduced in 10 pts; ibrutinib dose-reduced in 2 pts. Conclusions: iFCG achieves high rate of MRD-neg remission after 3 courses. Pt enrollment continues, and updated results will be presented at the ASCO meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02629809. [Table: see text]

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Average
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!