
pmid: 11490705
Purpose of the study The number of patients contacting general medical practitioner (GMP) out-of-hours services with dental problems is perceived to be a significant problem by the medical profession. This study was undertaken to design and pilot a triage protocol that could be used by non-dental staff to refer callers with dental complaints for appropriate treatment. Basic procedures A triage protocol was designed to address the patient conditions considered to be relevant to emergency dental care. The triage protocol was piloted for three months at a GMP cooperative in North Wales, which provided an out-of-hours service for 61 GMPs. Baseline data were collected for three months prior to the introduction of the triage protocol. Main findings The study showed that the number of dental callers contacting the out-of-hours service was not as great as GMPs imagined, and was similar to other studies. The introduction of the triage protocol resulted in a rise in the number of callers asked to call the general dental practitioner (GDP) support line. The number of unregistered patients given the name of a dentist also increased. The need to make a second telephone call seemed not to affect patient satisfaction since when patients were later questioned on their experience, those who had used the service since the introduction of the triage protocol were more likely to be satisfied with the service. Principal conclusions This study provides some evidence that a triage protocol can be used successfully by non-dental staff to sift requests for out-of-hours emergency dental care.
Emergency Medical Services, Hotlines, General Practice, Dental, Humans, Triage, Dental Care, Referral and Consultation
Emergency Medical Services, Hotlines, General Practice, Dental, Humans, Triage, Dental Care, Referral and Consultation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
