Downloads provided by UsageCounts
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>This folder provides tools and methods to address case study co-design processes in WeCount. This phase addresses the following: co-creating a suitable data collection protocol; and co-design of the project governance structure. At the end of this phase, the data collection campaign is set to start. It is noted that when entering the Co-Design phase, the following should have been established: (1) collaborative elaboration of a clear, narrow, and relevant problem statement; (2) a comprehensive understanding of the local mobility ecosystem and the relevant actors within it; and (3) an initial case study governance framework detailing different level of participation and commitment across citizens, scientific researchers, and other relevant actors / entities and stakeholders. Besides methods to address this phase (see pdf file) we propose the following tools: Tool, Collaborative Pilot Schedule (adapted from http://making-sense.eu/): The Collaborative Pilot Schedule Tool can be used in a workshop format to plan the case study in a participatory manner. The tool consists of a simple A0 printed calendar of the case study (or if this is conducted online, an interactive calendar on MIRO) and allows the team to collectively decide on the actual schedule of activities and tasks during the local action. In addition to effectively involving participants in the co-design of the action, this tool has proven also helpful in somewhat initially formalising their actual commitment. Tool, Community Contribution Canvas (adapted from http://making-sense.eu/): The Community Contribution Canvas tool is a large wall canvas which openly allows people to log contributions to the campaign, such as resources, sensor, meeting space, funds, time or even specific skills. Facilitators can fill out the fields in the chart according to the specific needs of WeCount. The tool is therefore designed to collectively explore, understand, and establish the level of commitment of each participant to the WeCount case study. It is also useful to identify expectations and commitments and to design different communication and engagement strategies tailored based on individuals��� skills, interests, and availability. Tool, Risk / Benefits Matrix: The tool enables participants to understand the risks and the benefits of sharing their data and to discuss possible solutions in terms of what data to share, with whom, and under what conditions. Pragmatically, it consists of scenario cards to stimulate discussions and a matrix allowing to position perceived risks and benefits of sharing the data. Video: Telraam Assembly Tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=QiO4BJAXnSg&t=4s&ab_channel=IdeasforChange
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 12 | |
| downloads | 19 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts