Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

WeCount Engagement Toolkit Phase 2: Co-Design

Authors: Ideas for Change;

WeCount Engagement Toolkit Phase 2: Co-Design

Abstract

This folder provides tools and methods to address case study co-design processes in WeCount. This phase addresses the following: co-creating a suitable data collection protocol; and co-design of the project governance structure. At the end of this phase, the data collection campaign is set to start. It is noted that when entering the Co-Design phase, the following should have been established: (1) collaborative elaboration of a clear, narrow, and relevant problem statement; (2) a comprehensive understanding of the local mobility ecosystem and the relevant actors within it; and (3) an initial case study governance framework detailing different level of participation and commitment across citizens, scientific researchers, and other relevant actors / entities and stakeholders. Besides methods to address this phase (see pdf file) we propose the following tools: Tool, Collaborative Pilot Schedule (adapted from http://making-sense.eu/): The Collaborative Pilot Schedule Tool can be used in a workshop format to plan the case study in a participatory manner. The tool consists of a simple A0 printed calendar of the case study (or if this is conducted online, an interactive calendar on MIRO) and allows the team to collectively decide on the actual schedule of activities and tasks during the local action. In addition to effectively involving participants in the co-design of the action, this tool has proven also helpful in somewhat initially formalising their actual commitment. Tool, Community Contribution Canvas (adapted from http://making-sense.eu/): The Community Contribution Canvas tool is a large wall canvas which openly allows people to log contributions to the campaign, such as resources, sensor, meeting space, funds, time or even specific skills. Facilitators can fill out the fields in the chart according to the specific needs of WeCount. The tool is therefore designed to collectively explore, understand, and establish the level of commitment of each participant to the WeCount case study. It is also useful to identify expectations and commitments and to design different communication and engagement strategies tailored based on individuals��� skills, interests, and availability. Tool, Risk / Benefits Matrix: The tool enables participants to understand the risks and the benefits of sharing their data and to discuss possible solutions in terms of what data to share, with whom, and under what conditions. Pragmatically, it consists of scenario cards to stimulate discussions and a matrix allowing to position perceived risks and benefits of sharing the data. Video: Telraam Assembly Tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=QiO4BJAXnSg&t=4s&ab_channel=IdeasforChange

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 12
    download downloads 19
  • 12
    views
    19
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
12
19