
Numerous transcription factors (TFs) encode information about upstream signals in the dynamics of their activation, but how downstream genes decode these dynamics remains poorly understood. Using microfluidics to control the nucleocytoplasmic translocation dynamics of the budding yeast TF Msn2, we elucidate the principles that govern how different promoters convert dynamical Msn2 input into gene expression output in single cells. Combining modeling and experiments, we classify promoters according to their signal‐processing behavior and reveal that multiple, distinct gene expression programs can be encoded in the dynamics of Msn2. We show that both oscillatory TF dynamics and slow promoter kinetics lead to higher noise in gene expression. Furthermore, we show that the promoter activation timescale is related to nucleosome remodeling. Our findings imply a fundamental trade‐off: although the cell can exploit different promoter classes to differentially control gene expression using TF dynamics, gene expression noise fundamentally limits how much information can be encoded in the dynamics of a single TF and reliably decoded by promoters.
570, Medicine (General), Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Time Factors, Models, Genetic, QH301-705.5, Msn2, Microfluidics, microfluidics, Active Transport, Cell Nucleus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Article, Nucleosomes, DNA-Binding Proteins, Kinetics, R5-920, gene expression noise, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Biology (General), gene regulation, transcription factor dynamics, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Transcription Factors
570, Medicine (General), Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Time Factors, Models, Genetic, QH301-705.5, Msn2, Microfluidics, microfluidics, Active Transport, Cell Nucleus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Article, Nucleosomes, DNA-Binding Proteins, Kinetics, R5-920, gene expression noise, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Biology (General), gene regulation, transcription factor dynamics, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Protein Binding, Transcription Factors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 138 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
