
pmid: 20023593
To evaluate the impact of acquisition time on F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) image quality, lesion detection rate, standard uptake and lesion volume measures.In 17 consecutively referred head and neck cancer patients, a 10-min acquisition of the head and neck was performed in list mode after completion of a whole-body PET-computed tomography scan. For each patient, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 10-min PET images were reconstructed. Image quality was scored on a 5-point scale. Lesions were visually identified and lesion locations were compared between scans with various acquisition times. Standard uptake values (SUVs) and lesion volumes were automatically obtained and compared.Image quality was scored excellent/good for 10 and 7-min scans; moderate for 5 and 3-min scans and poor/very poor for 2, 1 and 0.5-min scans. Lesion detection rate did not differ between scans with shorter acquisition times and the reference. Similarly, SUVmax was not significantly different between images with various scan times and the reference, except for the 0.5-min PET image (Wilcoxon, P = 0.04). Overall, lesion volume increased significantly with longer scan time (Friedman, P or = 3 min.Despite poor image quality for scans with short acquisition times, the lesion detection rate was not adversely affected. Increased scan time resulted in an increase in lesion volumes. This finding is of particular interest if PET images are implemented in radiation oncology treatment planning.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Electronic Data Processing, Time Factors, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Middle Aged, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Positron-Emission Tomography, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Female, Radiopharmaceuticals, Aged, Neoplasm Staging
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Electronic Data Processing, Time Factors, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Middle Aged, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Positron-Emission Tomography, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Female, Radiopharmaceuticals, Aged, Neoplasm Staging
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
