
AbstractA central need for neurodegenerative diseases is to find curative drugs for the many clinical subtypes, the causative gene for most cases being unknown. This requires the classification of disease cases at the genetic and cellular level, an understanding of disease aetiology in the subtypes and the development of phenotypic assays for high throughput screening of large compound libraries. Herein we describe a method that facilitates these requirements based on cell morphology that is being increasingly used as a readout defining cell state. In patient-derived fibroblasts we quantified 124 morphological features in 100,000 cells from 15 people with two genotypes (SPAST and SPG7) of Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (HSP) and matched controls. Using machine learning analysis, we distinguished between each genotype and separated them from controls. Cell morphologies changed with treatment with noscapine, a tubulin-binding drug, in a genotype-dependent manner, revealing a novel effect on one of the genotypes (SPG7). These findings demonstrate a method for morphological profiling in fibroblasts, an accessible non-neural cell, to classify and distinguish between clinical subtypes of neurodegenerative diseases, for drug discovery, and potentially for biomarkers of disease severity and progression.
Spastin, Genotype, Spastic Paraplegia, Hereditary, Science, Q, R, Metalloendopeptidases, Clinical sciences, Severity of Illness Index, Article, Machine Learning, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Mutation, Genetics, Disease Progression, Medicine, ATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular Activities, Humans, Single-Cell Analysis
Spastin, Genotype, Spastic Paraplegia, Hereditary, Science, Q, R, Metalloendopeptidases, Clinical sciences, Severity of Illness Index, Article, Machine Learning, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Mutation, Genetics, Disease Progression, Medicine, ATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular Activities, Humans, Single-Cell Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
