
pmid: 11861467
The basic helix-loop-helix genes Math3 and NeuroD are expressed by differentiating amacrine cells, retinal interneurons. Previous studies have demonstrated that a normal number of amacrine cells is generated in mice lacking either Math3 or NeuroD. We have found that, in Math3-NeuroD double-mutant retina, amacrine cells are completely missing, while ganglion and Müller glial cells are increased in number. In the double-mutant retina, the cells that would normally differentiate into amacrine cells did not die but adopted the ganglion and glial cell fates. Misexpression studies using the developing retinal explant cultures showed that, although Math3 and NeuroD alone only promoted rod genesis, they significantly increased the population of amacrine cells when the homeobox gene Pax6 or Six3 was co-expressed. These results indicate that Math3 and NeuroD are essential, but not sufficient, for amacrine cell genesis, and that co-expression of the basic helix-loop-helix and homeobox genes is required for specification of the correct neuronal subtype.
Homeodomain Proteins, Male, Mice, Knockout, Mice, Inbred ICR, PAX6 Transcription Factor, Helix-Loop-Helix Motifs, Gene Expression, Cell Count, Cell Differentiation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Retina, Repressor Proteins, Mice, Amacrine Cells, Culture Techniques, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Animals, Paired Box Transcription Factors, Female, Eye Proteins
Homeodomain Proteins, Male, Mice, Knockout, Mice, Inbred ICR, PAX6 Transcription Factor, Helix-Loop-Helix Motifs, Gene Expression, Cell Count, Cell Differentiation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Retina, Repressor Proteins, Mice, Amacrine Cells, Culture Techniques, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Animals, Paired Box Transcription Factors, Female, Eye Proteins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 239 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
